Charter Rights, State Expertise: Testing State Claims to Expert Knowledge

Emma Cunliffe

Charter Rights, State Expertise: Testing State Claims to Expert Knowledge

Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia

Research output: Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article considers the individual and collective significance of two decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2018: Ewert v. Canada and R. v. Gubbins.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	367-390
Journal	Supreme Court Law Review (2nd)
Volume	94
Publication status	Published - 2020

Access to Document

Charter Rights State Expertise Testing State Claims to Expert K

http://commons.allard.ubc.ca/fac_pubs/536

Cite this

@article{a3ddf043aef24ae58e4f3bbf40cbeecc,

title = "Charter Rights, State Expertise: Testing State Claims to Expert Knowledge",

abstract = "This article considers the individual and collective significance of two decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2018: Ewert v. Canada and R. v. Gubbins.",

author = "Emma Cunliffe",

year = "2020",

language = "English",

volume = "94",

pages = "367--390",

journal = "Supreme Court Law Review (2nd)",

issn = "0228-0108",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Charter Rights, State Expertise

T2 - Testing State Claims to Expert Knowledge

AU - Cunliffe, Emma

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This article considers the individual and collective significance of two decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2018: Ewert v. Canada and R. v. Gubbins.

AB - This article considers the individual and collective significance of two decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2018: Ewert v. Canada and R. v. Gubbins.

M3 - Article

SN - 0228-0108

VL - 94

SP - 367

EP - 390

JO - Supreme Court Law Review (2nd)

JF - Supreme Court Law Review (2nd)

ER -