Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Putting the Bar to the Test: An Examination of the Predictive Validity of Bar Exam Outcomes on Lawyering Effectiveness

  • Jason M. Scott
  • , Stephen N. Goggin
  • , Rick Trachok
  • , Jenny S. Kwon
  • , Sara Gordon
  • , Dean Gould
  • , Fletcher S. Hiigel
  • , Leah Chan Grinvald
  • , David Faigman
  • AccessLex Institute, West Chester, PA, USA
  • Department of Political Science, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
  • Nevada Board of Bar Examiners, Reno, NV, USA
  • Sérgio Vieira de Mello Professor of International Refugee Law, University of California College of the Law, San Francisco; Director of Policy, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies , USA
  • State Bar of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA
  • William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA

Research output: Articlepeer-review

Abstract

How well does bar exam performance predict lawyering effectiveness? Is performance on some components of the bar exam more predictive? The current study, the first of its kind to measure the relationship between bar exam scores and a new lawyer’s effectiveness, evaluates these questions by combining three unique datasets—bar results from the State Bar of Nevada, a survey of recently admitted lawyers, and a survey of supervisors, peers, and judges who were asked to evaluate the effectiveness of recently-admitted lawyers. We find that performance on both the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) and essay components of the Nevada Bar have little relationship with the assessed lawyering effectiveness of new lawyers, calling into question the usefulness of these tests.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-325
JournalJournal of Law & Empirical Analysis
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Cite this