Abstract
The focus of the paper is an analysis of reported Canadian custody cases in which a child's mixed race heritage was mentioned in the written judgment, both before and after the leading case, Van de Perre v. Edwards. The caselaw analysis considers questions such as judicial racism, "race-matching," and how race and culture are weighed against other factors relevant to a child's best interests. The conclusion offers suggestions for how courts should deal with custody disputes over mixed race children, based on trends identified in the case law. While racialized parents are not inevitably best suited for primary custody of mixed race children, it is key for any parent seeking custody to demonstrate their ability to foster the healthy development of a child's multifaceted identity. More directive legislative language might be useful in order to ensure that at least some judicial attention is paid to race and culture.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 309-380 |
Number of pages | 72 |
Journal | Canadian Journal of Family Law |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright - Copyright Canadian Journal of Family Law 2015Document feature - References; Tables
Last updated - 2023-11-21
CODEN - CJFLDC
SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Canada