Taking a Vacation from the Law? Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction and Section 7(4.1) of the Criminal Code

Research output: Articlepeer-review


Canada's extraterritorial child sex offences in section 7(4.1) of the Criminal Code are under-enforced, and have faced legal uncertainty, since coming into force in 1997. However, the recent decision of the B.C. Supreme Court in R. v. Klassen (2008) and the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Hape (2007) have opened the door for a more proactive approach to the investigation and prosecution of Canadian child sex offenders abroad. Canada's international treaty obligations in the widely adopted UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, as well as numerous international declarations and extensive state practice, support the necessary aspects of nationality-based extraterritorial jurisdiction over crimes involving the sexual abuse and exploitation of children. This article concludes by arguing for a more aggressive use of section 7(4.1) to combat the impunity of Canadian child sex offenders abroad. PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-209
Number of pages35
JournalCanadian Criminal Law Review
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2009

Bibliographical note

Copyright - Copyright Carswell Publishing Jun 2009; Last updated - 2023-11-22; SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Canada

Cite this