TY - JOUR
T1 - The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
T2 - Constitutional Bulwark or Colonial Remnant?
AU - Burns, Peter
PY - 1984
Y1 - 1984
N2 - The F. W. Guest Memorial Trust was established to honour the memory of Francis William Guest, MA, LLM, who was the first Professor of Law and the first full-time Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Otago, serving from 1959 until his death in November 1967. It was felt that the most fitting memorial to Professor Guest was a public address upon some aspect of law or some related topic which would be of interest to the practitioners and the students of law alike. The significance of the work of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in hearing appeals from Britain's overseas Empire and Commonwealth and from English ecclesiastical courts has long been recognised by historians and legal commentators. New Zealand's association with the Privy Council, which dates back to the first years of settlement, arose as a natural incident of the diaspora of the British people. For a new British community to which the colonists had brought their own legal system, there was no artificiality in a constitutional practice enabling an appeal at the ultimate level from the most distant part of the Empire, back to London as its centre and capital. Ultimately, the issue of retaining or abolishing appeals to the Privy Council is a political one. But it is not merely a matter of political judgment in terms of popular sentiment because the decision to abolish the right of appeal would have important consequences for the whole judicial system, the constitution of the Court of Appeal being the most significant. Such a decision should therefore not-be made without a careful analysis of its implications. The article reviews the arguments for and against the New Zealand abolishing appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and favours abolition, arguing that until the day that the New Zealand Court of Appeal is recognised as the ultimate court of this land, that remaining vestige of colonialism will continue to frustrate the creation of a truly New Zealand judicial culture.
AB - The F. W. Guest Memorial Trust was established to honour the memory of Francis William Guest, MA, LLM, who was the first Professor of Law and the first full-time Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Otago, serving from 1959 until his death in November 1967. It was felt that the most fitting memorial to Professor Guest was a public address upon some aspect of law or some related topic which would be of interest to the practitioners and the students of law alike. The significance of the work of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in hearing appeals from Britain's overseas Empire and Commonwealth and from English ecclesiastical courts has long been recognised by historians and legal commentators. New Zealand's association with the Privy Council, which dates back to the first years of settlement, arose as a natural incident of the diaspora of the British people. For a new British community to which the colonists had brought their own legal system, there was no artificiality in a constitutional practice enabling an appeal at the ultimate level from the most distant part of the Empire, back to London as its centre and capital. Ultimately, the issue of retaining or abolishing appeals to the Privy Council is a political one. But it is not merely a matter of political judgment in terms of popular sentiment because the decision to abolish the right of appeal would have important consequences for the whole judicial system, the constitution of the Court of Appeal being the most significant. Such a decision should therefore not-be made without a careful analysis of its implications. The article reviews the arguments for and against the New Zealand abolishing appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and favours abolition, arguing that until the day that the New Zealand Court of Appeal is recognised as the ultimate court of this land, that remaining vestige of colonialism will continue to frustrate the creation of a truly New Zealand judicial culture.
KW - Great Britain
KW - Privy Council
KW - Judicial Committee
KW - JCPC
M3 - Article
SN - 0078-6918
VL - 5
SP - 503
EP - 522
JO - Otago Law Review
JF - Otago Law Review
IS - 4
ER -