"The normal ones take time": Civil commitment and sexual assault in R. v Alsadi

Research output: Comment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

This comment addresses the issue of whether a woman who is civilly committed in a psychiatric facility can ever give a valid consent to sexual activity with someone employed by that facility to ensure her safety and protection. The paper argues that such a consent would be involuntary and invalid because it was obtained as a result of an abuse of a position of trust. It is argued that the imbalance of power between a civilly committed psychiatric patient and, in Alsadi, a security guard employed by the hospital is so significant that no meaningful or voluntary consent can be given by the woman involved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-457
Number of pages19
JournalCanadian Journal of Women and the Law
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Law
  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this