TY - JOUR
T1 - The Private Life of Environmental Treaties
AU - Affolder, A. Natasha
PY - 2009/7
Y1 - 2009/7
N2 - The gravitational pull of environmental treaties is felt not only by states. Yet international lawyers almost exclusively focus on states to explain treaty compliance, measure treaty implementation, and assess treaty effectiveness. This essay draws attention to a phenomenon that falls outside traditional boundaries of treaty analysis: the efforts of private corporations that aim at complying with environmental treaties. Existing models of treaty implementation are inadequate to explain these direct interactions between corporations and treaties. The dominant grammar of treaty “compliance” equally fails to fit. Using a little-studied example - the UNESCO World Heritage Convention - this essay highlights the phenomenon of corporations’ aspiring to conform their behavior to environmental treaty requirements.
AB - The gravitational pull of environmental treaties is felt not only by states. Yet international lawyers almost exclusively focus on states to explain treaty compliance, measure treaty implementation, and assess treaty effectiveness. This essay draws attention to a phenomenon that falls outside traditional boundaries of treaty analysis: the efforts of private corporations that aim at complying with environmental treaties. Existing models of treaty implementation are inadequate to explain these direct interactions between corporations and treaties. The dominant grammar of treaty “compliance” equally fails to fit. Using a little-studied example - the UNESCO World Heritage Convention - this essay highlights the phenomenon of corporations’ aspiring to conform their behavior to environmental treaty requirements.
KW - nvironmental Agreements
KW - Treaty Compliance
KW - World Heritage Convention
KW - Corporations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70549084959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70549084959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/s0002930000019953
DO - 10.1017/s0002930000019953
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:70549084959
SN - 0002-9300
VL - 103
SP - 510
EP - 526
JO - American Journal of International Law
JF - American Journal of International Law
IS - 3
ER -